Peer Review
All submitted articles will undergo an Initial Review by the Editorial Board. Manuscripts that pass this stage will then be sent to reviewers for a Double-Blind Peer Review process. After the peer review, the editorial team will conduct a Peer Preview to finalize the evaluation.
Following this, the manuscript will be returned to the authors for revision based on reviewer feedback.
Each paper is reviewed by at least two reviewers. However, if there is a significant difference in the reviewers’ assessments or under specific editorial considerations, the manuscript may be sent to a third reviewer for further evaluation.
Reviewer Guidelines
Dear Reviewer, please follow the instructions below:
-
Before reviewing, kindly visit the Focus and Scope section of the journal to ensure the manuscript aligns with its aims.
-
Assess whether the manuscript is suitable to proceed for review or should be declined.
-
Do not hesitate to reject the paper if it does not meet the journal’s quality or publication standards.
-
Please complete your review within the time frame specified.
-
Conduct the review thoroughly and objectively to help improve the overall quality of the manuscript.
Steps for Submitting Your Review Report
-
Accept the review invitation.
-
Download the manuscript from the journal system.
-
Prepare your review report by:
-
(a) Adding comments directly in the manuscript using the MS Word Review tool.
-
(b) Writing a summary of your comments and suggestions in the reviewer form.
-
-
Download the Reviewer Evaluation Form to:
-
(a) Evaluate each section of the article.
-
(b) Provide your recommendation (minor revision, major revision, or rejection).
-
(c) Optionally, write additional comments directly in the online review section.
-
-
Upload your completed review, including:
-
(a) The annotated manuscript,
-
(b) The completed evaluation form, and
-
(c) Click Submit Review to finalize your report.
-
